Anatoly fomenko new chronology forum
The new chronology is a pseudohistorical theory proposed by Anatoly Fomenko who argues that events of antiquity generally attributed to the ancient.!
New Chronology (Anatoly Fomenko): A Revised History Timeline
I don't see how the New Chronology would work.
There is too much "stuff" happening for it to happen in the Middle Ages It all takes longer than 1000 years, say, to fit it all in.
Is it somehow related to the Bishop Ussher theory?
and is it somehow more christianly acceptible (for that brand of christians who believe this....
There is too much "stuff" happening for it to happen in the Middle Ages It all takes longer than 1000 years, say, to fit it all in.
Is it somehow related to the Bishop Ussher theory?
As Wikipedia says
...his chronology that sought to establish the time and date of the creation as "the entrance of the night preceding the 23rd day of October...
Anatoly Fomenko - deviser of the so-called 'New Chronology'.
First to buy into Anatoly Fomenko's 'new chronology' you have to be prepared to pretty much ignore dating evidence derived from things like radiocarbon dating. The new chronology is a pseudohistorical theory proposed by Anatoly Fomenko who argues that events of antiquity generally attributed to the ancient. Is anyone on this forum familiar with the "new chronology" theory proposed by Fomenko that effectively suggests (to put it briefly) all history before the. Fomenko's changing the forum for the debate does not validate his argument that easily. the year before Christ 4004"; that is, around 6 pm on 22 October 4004 BC...
Click to expand...
and is it somehow more christianly acceptible (for that brand of christians who believe this....
er... tosh) to have a short chronology?
I have no problem with Bishop Ussher's work at the time he did it.
Trying to create a stable absolute chronology is a worthwhile endeavour - see archaeology!
How does the New Chronology deal with other dating methods? C14 behaves in a way that is internally consistent and